//m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html 我们塑造了建筑，建筑亦塑造了我们 Wed, 18 Sep 2024 02:59:55 +0800 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.4 //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-32085 Fri, 05 Oct 2018 04:18:38 +0000 #comment-32085 造型不错，就是上部空间感觉有点浪费，其实可以做成穹顶式大空间

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31362 Sat, 15 Sep 2018 13:16:41 +0000 #comment-31362 嗯还行

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31342 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:28:10 +0000 #comment-31342 评论区果真争议一片

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31261 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 11:46:00 +0000 #comment-31261 又见切片片

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31250 Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:37:07 +0000 #comment-31250 觉得放不开，这种风格的建筑应该更加大胆一些，细节的处理更细致一些 ，室内的装修也应该更大胆，看看扎婶的，虽然不喜欢也不赞同解构主义的建筑，但是扎婶做的东西真的让人没话说，这个顶多算模仿不成功

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31229 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:48:39 +0000 #comment-31229 绝对是gmp下面的小弟做的。。。

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31226 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 15:51:42 +0000 #comment-31226 做这样的设计不懂为何，就不能给本土设计师一些机会

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31199 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 03:43:11 +0000 #comment-31199 线条挺好看的

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31189 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:29:21 +0000 #comment-31189 置身其下可能会觉得，尺度过大？

]]> //m.stpapt.com/archcollege/2018/09/41684.html#comment-31188 Mon, 10 Sep 2018 02:28:54 +0000 #comment-31188 看总体效果图，外形的一片片板显得尺度好大

]]>